3rd Jun 2008 | 10:07 am | Filed under Government

Michael Johnson, Federal member for Ryan, made a great speech about the Main Roads and WBTNI processes regarding the Kenmore Bypass and Moggill Pocket Sub Arterial. He supports our assertion that Stage 1 and Stage 2 are tightly linked; the Bypass would create a second bottleneck; and we should investigate a new bridge at Bellbowrie. Here are key excerpts, followed by the full text, as taken from the Federal Hansard. Thank you very much, Michael Johnson!

…The ramifications of this project are that it would effectively slice and dice the suburbs of Bellbowrie, Moggill, Kenmore and Pullenvale. I want to place on the record here in the parliament very strongly and very clearly that, as the federal member for Ryan I have great reservations—not only about stage 1 but in particular about stage 2 of the Moggill pocket subarterial, because, as sure as day follows night, if stage 1 goes ahead, stage 2 will definitely proceed. As I say, stage 2 will slice through the beautiful suburbs of Bellbowrie, Moggill and Pullenvale …

The Kenmore bypass proposal would effectively create a second bottleneck, because traffic would merge into the Centenary Highway and the Western Freeway. This is certainly no visionary solution, as those who live in the western suburbs of Brisbane and in the Ryan electorate would be all too aware. The Centenary residents would be terribly affected

We must provide long-term solutions, not just bandaid solutions—and from all accounts Kenmore bypass would be a very short-term, bandaid solution. There are several options that need to be canvassed and need to be explored to find a long-term and sustainable solution. This would include a green bridge, a light rail option, and, in particular, an outer western ring road…

(Here is the entire text:)

Mr JOHNSON (Ryan) (9.40 pm)—Tonight I want to speak very loud and clear as the federal member for Ryan and to highlight to the people of Ryan, and particularly to the residents of Chapel Hill, Kenmore, Moggill, Bellbowrie and Pullenvale in the Ryan electorate, the continuing incompetence and shortsightedness of the Queensland state Labor government, thehead of that government, Premier Bligh, and in particular the minister for main roads, Mr Paul Lucas. Mr Lucas recently announced that the Queensland state government would seriously investigate the option of the Moggill pocket sub-arterial stage 1 and stage 2, which is also known locally as the Kenmore bypass. The Kenmore bypass is a local issue that has certainly aroused the very strong interest of the constituents of the western suburbs of Brisbane, and those suburbs I mentioned in particular. Because, if the Kenmore bypass were to proceed, the implications for the people of the western suburbs are serious. Many homes and the residents of those suburbs would be detrimentally affected. The ramifications of this project are that it would effectively slice and dice the suburbs of Bellbowrie, Moggill, Kenmore and Pullenvale. I want to place on the record here in the parliament very strongly and very clearly that, as the federal member for Ryan I have great reservations—not only about stage 1 but in particular about stage 2 of the Moggill pocket subarterial, because, as sure as day follows night, if stage 1 goes ahead, stage 2 will definitely proceed. As I say, stage 2 will slice through the beautiful suburbs of Bellbowrie, Moggill and Pullenvale and will have an enormous negative impact on the value of many homes and particularly the lifestyle of many residents in the western suburbs.

Those who live in the western suburbs of Brisbane and the Ryan electorate live in a very special part of Brisbane. We are of course all too aware of the terrible traffic woe that is Moggill Road. Moggill Road is effectively a car park. We have to ensure that transport solutions are genuinely long term and not just bandaid measures, as the state Labor government in Queensland is proposing. The Kenmore bypass proposal would effectively create a second bottleneck, because traffic would merge onto the Centenary Highway and the Western Freeway. This is certainly no visionary solution, as those who live in the western suburbs of Brisbane and in the Ryan electorate would be all too aware. The Centenary residents would be terribly affected. I also represent the Centenary suburbs of Brisbane: Jindalee, Westlake and Middle Park. All those tens of thousands of residents in the wonderful Ryan electorate, which I have a great honour to represent here in the parliament for a third term, would be terribly affected.

Mr Hartsuyker—And represent them well.

Mr JOHNSON—I do seek to represent them very strongly. We know that infrastructure is a very major issue in the western suburbs of Brisbane. We must provide long-term solutions, not just bandaid solutions—and from all accounts Kenmore bypass would be a very short-term, bandaid solution. There are several options that need to be canvassed and need to be explored to find a long-term and sustainable solution. This would include a green bridge, a light rail option, and, in particular, an outer western ring road. The concept of an outer western ring road is one that would take heavy freight traffic from the Warrego Highway along the Brisbane Valley across the front of the Wivenhoe Dam. The freight traffic that is increasingly using the Centenary Highway and the Western Freeway would be diverted along this outer western ring road. This freight traffic is increasingly dominating our local roads as they seek to head north. It is important that the Queensland state government look to a study of the western ring road to be built as part of the overall long-term infrastructure solution to South-East Queensland’s economic and population growth.

We hear so much about infrastructure from Labor both at the state level and at the federal level but, quite clearly, rhetoric does not match the reality. In April the state government of Queensland announced that it would scrap the initial plans that it had to explore this concept of an outer western ring road. I want a place on the record very strongly and very clearly (1) that I have great reservations about the Kenmore Bypass and (2) that I very strongly support the idea that funding be made available for exploring the capacity of an outer western ring road to be built as something of a longterm plan, a visionary plan for the people of Ryan.

(Time expired)



11 Comments to “Great speech by Michael Johnson”


Robert


All I can say is wow. By the way, I saw the article on the “Resumption Trauma” on the courier mail website today at lunch time. Think its the first time I have seen anything in the Courier on the subject. Wasn’t front page but its a start…


Craig


Cynical, cynical. Johnson has had years - three terms as he rightly points out - to get a positive solution to this problem. What has he done? It’s easy to step up now that this is basically a done deal.


keiran


Hear hear Craig. The tacked on addition of “a green bridge, a light rail option” is mentioned once and is definitely NOT the point of his speech. While this may support the SOSK in passing, it definitely doesn’t look like he’s searching for solutions to our traffic problems.


Question to Craig


I don’t understand what you mean? Please explain…


Lauren


what are all the implications for the residents of the centenary suburbs?

would it be they would have to queue longer on the hwy around the KB entry point to the Centenary Hwy eg 75 000 cars and trucks ‘cutting-in’?

how exactly is it proposed that the KB join the Centenary Hwy? it looks like a sharp angle - would there be traffic lights or a big merge lane like the inbound Chapel Hill merge lane onto the Hwy?


Peter


Congratulations to Michael Johnson for his contribution to this debate. Unfortunately our State Member Bruce Flegg has not seen the problem in the same light. Bruce is only interested in getting re-elected and pandering to the Moggill and Bellbowrie residents. I urge the people of Kenmore to dump Bruce at the next election, with the lack of support from Kenmore residents this may be a solution. I have voted for Bruce in the past but he has now lost me and (I hope) many other residents in Kenmore.


Fred


Agree Peter. I was hoping we may get a Nat candidate but that hope is lost with the LNP. Why would anyone want a freeway through there suburb when there is a 40 year old solution that was paid for that would solve the problem! Then there would be enough $$$ left over to pay for all the other things Kenmore Central needs - fixing the roundabout, ped overpasses and school drop off areas. Makes my blood boil reading the letters to the editor that are so mislead/ misinformed. In no way would the Kenmore Bypass be better or cheaper than the alternatives and yet this keeps being pushed. Just shows they have probably never got out of their cars long enough to walk from Rafting Ground Park along the Council paths to Kenmore Road and seen the terrain and extent of challenging construction required to build on this! I suppose Johnson is younger and thinks about the longer term future more and the big picture. I am pleased he is pushing the alternatives. I’ll vote for him next time and so will my relations in Moggill!


Fred


Forgot to say, Johnson and Howard and the Ipswich guy (who lost his seat over the Goodna bypass) must be interested the Labor won’t sell the land. From memory Flegg was against Howard on this and made a fuss about all the extra traffic through his area - I could never understand that because I thought it was affecting 4/5 properties and didn’t have any on or off ramps. Maybe someone can explain Flegg’s thought processes to me because it makes no sense to me.


Marie


Just to update you on opinions of a couple of business people I spoke with today. Both are located in the strip of shops fronting Moggill Road roughly opposite Kenmore State School.

A physiotherapist told me that while he was sorry for people who would lose their homes, he thought the Kenmore Bypass was a good idea because he had been told ‘officially’ (whatever that means) that if the Bypass did not go ahead, then widening Moggill Road would happen and his premises would be consumed in the widening process.

I also raised the Kenmore Bypass with a nearby pharmacist’s staff who told me, almost word perfect, the same story. “If the Bypass goes ahead, then our shop will have to go.”

She added that the Brisbane City Council “almost made the mistake of putting a library behind our shop - we are so glad that was defeated”. (obviously not a book lover)

So it seems that some Kenmore business people are in favour of the bypass because they are fearful of losing their premises due to the threat of Moggill Road being widened.

Funny thing is, if the bypass goes through, won’t a whole lot of traffic bypass Kenmore shopping and head for Indooroopilly? The local business people don’t seem to be considering that possibility.

I was surprised how fearful both these people were and both said it was ‘definitely official’


Jules


At the risk of possibly offending some business owners - if it was a choice between people losing their homes or businesses having to relocate - I’d rather the homes were spared and the businesses moved (with govt assistance) .Overall though you’d hope that neither was necessary. And I agree that it’s a concern re “officially” told that Moggill Road would be widened in the event the bypass is defeated.


Fred


Two words for you Marie. “Elected Representatives” This is such rubbish! They talk about the past as if they lived here - well many years ago the area of the coffee club was going to be another bypass road that was going to cut through KSS and that area was never supposed to be developed. None of our elected reps talk about that do they?! Build the flaming bridge in Bellbowrie and they won’t need to resume anyone - a home nor a business! My BP just keeps rising with these fools.


Leave a Comment


(will not be published)